In his column titled “Someone needs to tell Seahawks they play in a pass-and-catch league” Steve Kelley imparts his vast sum of NFL
knowledge on the fan base by arguing that the Seahawks should have drafted better receivers. He
starts by implicitly criticizing the Seahawks attempts at building an elite
defense:
I wish the Seahawks had more seriously addressed their passing game in this draft, wish they had picked at least one wide receiver.
Last season, NFL scoreboards spun like dials on a slot machine.
The Green Bay Packers had the worst defense in the league. They lost once. The New England Patriots were the second-worst defense. They went to the Super Bowl.
Of course, Kelley surely realizes that those teams also
have elite QBs in Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, etc. It bugs me to no end when pundits act
as if teams like the 49ers and Seahawks are doing something bizarre and
unconventional by emphasizing defense in similar model to the post-2000 Ravens.
As far as I know, no NFL coach or general manager is denying the proven formula
of NFL success through elite offenses. But
elite offenses generally require elite QBs who are very hard to find. When you
don’t have a franchise quarterback identified you logically invest resources
on the defensive side of the ball where it is the least dependent on any one
single player. The Hawks allocated so much draft capital towards the defense
because that’s naturally where the highest return on investment is for now.
He specifically errors when he says:
To that end, the Seahawks should have drafted at least one wide receiver. There were plenty of good ones available. Thirty-three were taken in the draft, including Mohamed Sanu, Nick Toon, Chris Givens, Ryan Broyles, DeVier Posey and Juron Criner, all of whom, I believe, could help.We have everyone reason to believe Sidney Rice can be a greater receiver with a decent quarterback throwing to him. Mike Williams showed he can be of pro bowl caliber when he has a skilled QB who can fit passes into small windows in a west coast offense style (this is not Tavaris Jackson). But let's set aside Sidney Rice and Mike Williams for now. The rest of these receiver "ifs" are a result of their inevitable development process. Starting caliber receivers commonly require 2-3 years (sometimes as long as a quarterback even) to develop to their full potential. Tate, Baldwin, Lockette, and Durham haven't even had two full seasons in the NFL.If a 2nd round pick like Tate doesn't come around then Schneider should get criticized for making a bad pick but not for failing to add even more rookie receivers we won't be able to evaluate for a few seasons to come without having a franchise QB identified anyways. Is this really your solution, Steve? I'm no Martha Stewart but would you start baking another cake if the one you had didn't look good after sitting in the oven for 5 minutes? No. See, even Martha Stewart knows more about football than Steve Kelley.
The Hawks did well last spring, signing undrafted free agents Doug Baldwin and Ricardo Lockette and drafting Kris Durham. But their passing game still is loaded with ifs.
If new quarterback Matt Flynn is the second coming of Matt Hasselbeck; if tight end Zach Miller is allowed to be more receiver and less blocker; if Sidney Rice can stay healthy; if Mike Williams is repaired; if Durham is healthy and plays to the promise of the scouting reports; if Lockette really is as good as he looked late last season, and if Baldwin plays again like the next incarnation of Bobby Engram, then maybe that will be enough.
But that's a load of ifs.
The best way to upgrade our passing game isn’t by
drafting even more receivers whose success would be largely dependent on the incumbent QB. It’s by upgrading the QB position first and foremost. The Hawks have been aggressive
doing just that by signing Matt Flynn and drafting Russell Wilson. By all means, I'll be the first wringing my hands for the Seahawks to spend early draft picks on a receiver if Matt Flynn plays this season like his only two prior NFL games or if Russell Wilson defies the Mel Kipers of this world by becoming the first franchise QB under 6 feet. I’m all for
maintaining healthy criticism and pressure on our front office (especially for any Seattle sports
team!) but I have nothing but contempt for nonsensical knee-jerk reactions coming from the
Seattle Times. Sit down, Steve.
P.S.
Stay tuned for an upcoming post reviewing the Seahawks 2012 draft.
Steve Kelly is quite possibly the worst sports columnist in the world. All of his articles are reactionary pandering to uninformed sports fans. He never adds anything new to the discussion except for critisms of his work. I stopped reading anything written by him a long time ago. I suggest all USTN readers follow suit and boycott him.
ReplyDeleteRead Jerry brewers work instead. It is infinitely better.
Yeah, I think ill just let it go the next time I read something infuriating from Kelley.
ReplyDeleteI do read Jerry Brewer and like the way he writes. In my opinion, the best Seahawks analysis is at FieldGulls, Hawkblogger, and 17power.
Yeah, I really like Jerry Brewer for all things sports, not just Seahawks. I like how he stays level headed and doesnt over react to stuff. I also like how he branches out from the big three sports (basketball, baseball and football) but still keeps the stories interesting.
DeleteMy favorite Seahawks source in Hugh Millen on KJR 950am. I love listening to him disect the game on Monday mornings. For whatever reason, I tend to not read about the Seahawks online.
Brock Huard on ESPN 710 knows his stuff too. His best segments are 'chalk talk' where he explains a play through video which posted on the website and there's quite a few on youtube.
Delete