Thank goodness he's wearing pants. |
Alright, to be fair, the Mariners had to pay a high price to acquire such hilarity. Yes, Doug Fister (you barely even know 'er!) will be sorely missed, both for his pitching ability and his hilarious, juvenile name. I mean, the Mariners really had never been graced with such a hilarious name as Doug Fister in their history, but I suppose the public wanted a less horrifying image brought up by their funny names. Now Charlie Furbush? Come on now. Family appeal right there, that's for sure. That may just be the greatest last name in sports since Gerald Firecrotch joined the New York Knicks in the 1960s (look it up.)
Regardless of names, this is a pretty solid piece of work by the Mariners at the trade deadline. Not only did they bring in two average MLB players who happen to be young and maybe, just maybe, have some upside in Wells and Furbush, they got a solid 3B prospect (20-year-old Francisco Martinez) and a PTBNL that is probably actually good and not Matt Stairs in any way. Along with that, the Mariners got rid of injury-plagued Erik Bedard for Trayvon Robinson (the names!) and Chih-Hsien Chang (the glorious names!), two upside-heavy young outfielders. Simply put, the Mariners used the only real tokens they had to get younger and, possibly, better.
A bit more in-depth, Casper Wells appears to be about as close to an average corner outfielder as imaginable. He bats about .270, he has a little bit of power, and he can slide over to center if he absolutely has to. In short, he is perfectly usable but not about to win a game by himself, regardless of his current hot start for the M's (.375 avg.) Furbush seems about the same, a classic solid relief pitcher (3.62 ERA) who can swing over and give you an OK start if he has to. Martinez is hitting quite well, though not exactly tearing up the place, in double-A, which is damn good for a 20-year-old. Robinson was apparently one of the better prospects in the Dodgers system who seems content to stick with the Pat Burrell approach to hitting, which is to say never swing at anything ever. Chang has some upside, so hooray there. There's really nothing else we could ask of GMZ.
Oh wait, we could ask for good free agent signings. Yes, we need those too, Miguel Olivo and Chone Figgins are basically atrocious.
If only the Ms could convince tim spooneybarger to come out of retirement, they would be set.
ReplyDeleteAlso when it comes to free agents I think GMZ gets a little pass for chine fictive because he was supposed to be good. it is not the front office's fault he fell off the face of the earth. However, there is no such pass for miguel olive. He has sucked everywhere, including his first trip to Seattle.
Well, a great front office should be able to see warning signs with players, such as that Chone Figgins was aging, had just had a career year that was far and away better than any other year he'd had, and while a lot of it was just sheer bad luck, great front offices avoid that. Even so, GMZ is great.
ReplyDeleteI tried to comment on this like 5 times. First I tried while in Great Britain. However, something about the stupid British internet kept making it fail. It must have something to do with the metric system. Next, I tried back home in the states. This time something was wrong with blogspot. No comments would work anywhere. It is like the internet doesn’t want to read what I have to say.
ReplyDeleteAnyways, what I was trying to say in a timely manner was, I think GMZ shouldnt take that much blame for the disaster that has been Chone Figgins. He had been a good player for the Angels for years. True, 2009 was his best year, but while a permanent player for the Angels he never batted below .267 or got on base at a rate lower than .336. He took a complete a total nose dive when he got to Seattle. Most people were upbeat at the time and saw it as a good signing.
The one thing I think that GMZ failed at is recognizing that we already had the same player on the team in Ichiro. No team needs two high onbase speedsters when there is no one to drive them in.
Well, I disagree with the fact that a team doesn't need two of those: there is always a need to get on-base and just cause you're a singles guy doesn't imply you won't help create runs with or without power hitters.
ReplyDelete